LANE v. WALGREEN CO.

LANE v. WALGREEN CO.

Plaintiff:	PATRICIA G. LANE
Defendant:	WALGREEN CO.
Case Number:	1:2012cv01180
Filed:	August 20, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 24, 2014	Filing 109 ORDER - Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motions to Strike ; This cause is before the Court on three motions filed by Defendant Walgreen Company a motion for partial summary judgment on Count II of Plaintiff's complaint Docket No. 36 , filed on January 15, 2014; a motion to strike Plaintiff's expert disclosures and exclude Plaintiff's expert witnesses Docket No. 47 , filed on February 18, 2014; and a motion to strike Plaintiff's second s upplemental expert disclosures Docket No. 57 , filed on March 14, 2014. The two motions to strike are DENIED and the motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/24/2014. (CKM) Modified on 6/25/2014 (CKM).
May 22, 2014	Filing 105 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT: For these reasons, as more fully set forth in Defendant's response brief, Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend [Filing No. 45] is denied *SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/22/2014. (DW)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 24, 2014

Filing 109 ORDER - Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motions to Strike ; This cause is before the Court on three motions filed by Defendant Walgreen Company a motion for partial summary judgment on Count II of Plaintiff's complaint Docket No. 36 , filed on January 15, 2014; a motion to strike Plaintiff's expert disclosures and exclude Plaintiff's expert witnesses Docket No. 47 , filed on February 18, 2014; and a motion to strike Plaintiff's second s upplemental expert disclosures Docket No. 57 , filed on March 14, 2014. The two motions to strike are DENIED and the motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/24/2014. (CKM) Modified on 6/25/2014 (CKM).

May 22, 2014

Filing 105 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT: For these reasons, as more fully set forth in Defendant's response brief, Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend [Filing No. 45] is denied ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/22/2014. (DW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LANE v. WALGREEN CO.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: WALGREEN CO.
Represented By:	Jeffrey D. Hawkins
Represented By:	Beth A. Schenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICIA G. LANE
Represented By:	Matthew M. Golitko
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?