WALKER v. ASTRUE
PAMELA K. WALKER |
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
1:2012cv01285 |
September 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 26 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by PAMELA K. WALKER, 29 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/8/2014.(MAC) |
Filing 24 ORDER - ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ;The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 21 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) an d Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds that said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request that her case be remanded for further administrative proceedings is GRAN TED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration. A new ALJ should be appointed, one who will take the necessary steps to clarify Dr. Hehner's diagnosis of RSD, including making a direct request to Dr. Hehner for additional records or a more detailed report. In the event that neither can be obtained, the ALJ should request that Dr. Hehner explain his reasons for rendering his diagnosis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/6/2014.(CKM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.