KONECRANES, INC. v. DAVIS et al
Plaintiff: KONECRANES, INC.
Defendant: INDUSTRIAL & CRANE, INC. and BRIAN SCOTT DAVIS
Case Number: 1:2012cv01700
Filed: November 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER: For the reasons explained, the Court GRANTS Mr. Davis' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 73.] Judgment will issue accordingly ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/18/2014. (DW)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER granting 55 Counter-Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - The Court GRANTS Counter-Defendant Konecranes' Motion to Dismiss. [Dkt. 55.] The Court DISMISSES ICS' unfair competition counterclaim WITHOUT PREJUDICE for improper venu e. The Court DISMISSES the Defendants' abuse of process counterclaim WITH PREJUDICE because it fails to state a claim as a matter of law. Because other claims remain pending in this action, no partial judgment shall issue at this time. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/18/2013. (JKS)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER - The Court ORDERS the parties to conduct whatever investigation is necessary and file a joint statement, or competing statements if they cannot agree, by August 9, 2013, detailing each party's position as to whether each counterclaim is compulsory or permissive and, if either of them is permissive, the independent basis for the Court's jurisdiction over that claim. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/29/2013. (JKS)
April 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages, [dkt. 14 ]. Konecranes' tortious interference with contractual relationships claim (Count III) and its unfair competition claim (Count IV) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No partial judgment shall issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/12/2013. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KONECRANES, INC. v. DAVIS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDUSTRIAL & CRANE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN SCOTT DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KONECRANES, INC.
Represented By: Joel E. Tragesser
Represented By: James Dimos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?