STODGHILL v. USA, et al.
| GREGORY PAUL STODGHILL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER and HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON |
| 1:2012mc00110 |
| November 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ENTRY - The Court again instructs Mr. Stodghill that he must file a complaint which conforms with the requirements of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if he wishes to initiate a law suit under this case number. Mr. Stodghill's objection and request to reconsider [Dkt. 4] is therefore DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/12/2013. Copy Mailed.(JD)
|
|
Filing
3
ENTRY - Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Writ for Declaratory Challenge is DENIED. The petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. 2 ] is denied without prejudice. The court will reconsider the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the event that a complaint is filed consistent with the directions set forth in Part I of this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/29/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
