ROHLER v. ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION
| PAMELA SUE ROHLER |
| ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION |
| 1:2013cv00040 |
| January 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ENTRY - Ms. Rohler's Motion in Limine (Dkt. No. 67) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. RRNA's Motion in Limine (Dkt. No. 75) is GRANTED. If the parties wish to renew any arguments as the trial unfolds, they are free to approach the bench and do so. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/11/2014. *** SEE ORDER *** (CKM)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 58 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/2/2014. (MGG) (Main Document 77 replaced on 7/2/2014) (MGG).
|
|
Filing
52
ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS - RRNA's Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 32 ) is DENIED. Ms. Rohler's Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 33 ) is GRANTED. RRNA's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Summar y Judgment is GRANTED as to Ms. Rohler's punitive damages claim, and that claim is DISMISSED. Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Ms. Rohler's retaliation claim, and that claim is allowed to proceed. Further, Summary Judgment is DENIED as t o RRNA's Counter Claim and the Counter Claim is DISMISSED. Ms. Rohler is has fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry to amend her Complaint. RRNA will then have fourteen (14) days to file its amended answer. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/25/2014. (MGG) Modified on 3/26/2014 (MGG).
|
|
Filing
41
ENTRY on Motion to Stay - RRNA's Motion to Stay (Dkt. 27 ) is GRANTED. This action is STAYED for 45 days from the date of this Entry. Ms. Rohler is ORDERED to pay the Bill of Costs in Case No. 1:10-cv-00254-TWP-DKL within 45 days of the date of this Entry. If Ms. Rohler is unable to pay the Bill of Costs, she must instead file with the Court, within 45 days of the date of this Entry, a statement substantiating her financial inability supported by affidavit or exhibit. If Ms. Rohler fails to either pay or file a properly supported statement of financial inability, the Court will dismiss this action. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/27/2013. (TRG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ROHLER v. ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PAMELA SUE ROHLER | |
| Represented By: | David M. Henn |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Cummings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
