WALKER v. TRAILER TRANSIT, INC.
| HUBERT E. WALKER |
| TRAILER TRANSIT, INC. |
| 1:2013cv00124 |
| January 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - The Court finds that Mr. Walker cannot prove any set of any facts that would support his claim for relief based upon the allegations set forth in his Complaint. Therefore, Trailer Transit's Moti on for Judgment on the Pleadings (Filing No. 76 ) is GRANTED, and Mr. Walker's Class Action Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final judgment shall issue in a separate entry. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/19/2015. (MGG) Modified on 2/20/2015 (MGG).
|
|
Filing
70
ENTRY on Motion for Summary Judgment - Trailer Transit's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part on Mr. Walker's breach of contract claim, and is GRANTED on Mr. Walker's unjust enrichment claim. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/14/2014. (TRG)
|
|
Filing
29
ENTRY ON MOTION TO REMAND - Mr. Walker's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 10 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2013. (JD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
