GRADY v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District GRADY v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES

GRADY v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES

Plaintiff:	RUSSELL D. GRADY
Defendant:	AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES
Case Number:	1:2013cv00342
Filed:	March 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2015	Filing 66 ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds that Mr. Grady has not met his burden of presenting evidence showing that there is a genuine dispute of material fact on his discrimination, retaliation, and harassment claims warranting trial. Therefore, Xerox's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 42) is GRANTED, and Mr. Grady's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Copy Mailed. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/4/2015. (MGG)
November 13, 2014	Filing 65 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Fees and Expenses. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay Defendant $5002.50 for causing Defendant to move to compel his discovery responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/13/2014 (dist made) (CBU)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2015

Filing 66 ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds that Mr. Grady has not met his burden of presenting evidence showing that there is a genuine dispute of material fact on his discrimination, retaliation, and harassment claims warranting trial. Therefore, Xerox's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 42) is GRANTED, and Mr. Grady's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Copy Mailed. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/4/2015. (MGG)

November 13, 2014

Filing 65 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Fees and Expenses. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay Defendant $5002.50 for causing Defendant to move to compel his discovery responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/13/2014 (dist made) (CBU)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GRADY v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RUSSELL D. GRADY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?