MAMON v. SHEPHERD et al
| KEVIN J. MAMON |
| KEITH OLIVER, KATHY PIERCE, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY, MIKE SHEPHERD, JORDAN CONLEY, VICKI MOORE and HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2013cv00345 |
| March 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ENTRY: Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice was entered on the clerk's docket on June 10, 2013. [Dkt. 12.] Three post-judgment motions are now pending. The plaintiff's motion requesting copies, [ dkt 16], presents an administrative matter and is granted. A copy of the amended complaint, [dkt 10], shall be included with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. The motion pertaining to the possible viability of claims in the amended complaint and for leave to supplement the amended complaint, [dkt 15], is denied without prejudice because the final judgment has not been vacated. The motion for relief from judgment filed on July 17, 2013, remains pending. [Dkt. 14.] Under the circumstances described above, the supplemental complaint, [dkt 18], is of no effect at present (see Entry for additional information). Copy via US Mail to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/18/2013. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
