GREEN v. MONARCH RECOVERY MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
EVA M. GREEN |
DHC CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC and MONARCH RECOVERY MANAGEMENT, INC. |
1:2013cv00418 |
March 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 ORDER - granting in part and denying in part 124 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion for Summary Judgment *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/29/2015. (CKM) |
Filing 121 ORDER denying 107 Motion for Leave to File Additional Affirmative Defenses. **SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/1/2014. (MGG) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants to Comply with Discovery Obligations. The Court grants the Defendants twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to supplement its responses to Plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production in a manner consistent with this Order. **SEE ORDER**Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/24/2014. (MGG) |
Filing 51 ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS - The aforementioned reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. [Dkts. 16 , 26 , 31 .]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/16/2013. (JD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.