SALISBURY v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: MARK SALISBURY
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Case Number: 1:2013cv00856
Filed: May 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of HabeasCorpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability - Petitioner Mark Salisbury seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to his conviction for child molesting in the DeKalb Superior Court. Having considered th e pleadings, the expanded record, and the parties' arguments, and being duly advised, the Court finds that Salisbury has not shown his entitlement to relief and that his petition for writ of habeas corpus must be denied. Judgment consistent w ith this Entry shall now issue. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing ' 2254 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. ' 2253(c), the court finds that Salisbury has failed to show that reasonable jurist s would find Ait debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy Mailed. **SEE ENTRY**Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/15/2015 (MGG) Modified on 6/15/2015 (MGG).
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The petitioner's current custodian, as shown in the caption of this Entry, is substituted as the sole respondent. Because Salisbury's habeas petition appears on its face to be deficient, he shall have through June 17, 2013, in which to supplement his petition consistent with the circumstances discussed in Part II of this Entry. If available, petitioner shall also include with his supplement a transcript of his guilty plea hearing. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/31/2013. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail) (JKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SALISBURY v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARK SALISBURY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?