PLATT et al v. ARGOSY UNIVERSITY
| TIMOTHY C PLATT and SONIA BOSQUEZ-PLATT |
| ARGOSY UNIVERSITY |
| 1:2013cv01257 |
| August 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: Presently before the court is the complaint of relators Timothy Platt and Sonia Platt, who purport t o bring a qui tam action on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act ("FCA"). The Platts may not bring a FCA claim on behalf of the United States. Based on the discussion in Part I of this Entry, the complaint [dkt. 1] is stricken because it has not been filed by an attorney admitted to practice in this court and has not been filed by unrepresented parti es seeking to assert their own claim(s). Although stricken, the clerk shall retain the complaint in the file. The Platts shall have through October 17, 2013, in which to file an amended complaint. If an amended complaint is filed, any FCA claim must be asserted by counsel representing the Platts as relators. If an amended complaint is not filed as just prescribed, the action will be dismissed (see Order for additional information.) Copy of Order mailed to the Plaintiffs via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/18/2013.(SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
