FARR v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al
| KENNETH W. FARR |
| ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA (USA) HOLDINGS CO., ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC., ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA, INC. and UNITED AUTO WORKERS (UAW) LOCAL 933 |
| 1:2013cv01266 |
| August 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER. Rolls-Royce's Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1) as it relates to Mr. Farr's counsel is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. [Filing No. 50 .] Due to the automatic stay triggered by Mr. Farr's pending Chapter 1 3 proceeding, Rolls-Royce's Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (g)(1) as it relates to Mr. Farr, [Filing No. 50 ], Mr. Farr's Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, [Filing No. 60 ], and Mr. Farr's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on Rolls-Royce's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, [Filing No. 61 ], are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/10/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 23 Rolls-Royce's Motion for Summary Judgment - For the reasons explained, the Court GRANTS Rolls-Royce's Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 23.] Mr. Farr's ERISA claims are dismissed with prejudice, but his sta te law claims over which the Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction are dismissed without prejudice. In light of Rolls-Royce's request for a briefing schedule regarding attorney's fees, [Filing No. 24 at 9], the Court asks the Magistrate Judge to meet with the parties to see if an agreement on fees can be reached. If an agreement cannot be reached, the Magistrate Judge should set a briefing schedule regarding the propriety of an award of attorney's fees. Final judgment will issue accordingly. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/30/2014. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
