CARUSO v. AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
JILL CARUSO |
CIRCLE CENTER MALL, LLC. and AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. |
1:2013cv01318 |
August 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1) The above-styled cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED WITH prejudice; 2) The parties bear their own respective attorneys' fees and costs; and 3) To the extent not otherwise disposed herein, all pending motions are hereby denied or moot and the case is. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/7/2015.(DW) |
Filing 46 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 45 CLOSED DISMISSED - Acknowledges Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; cause is DISMISSED without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees, expert fees, litigation expenses and costs incurred in litigating these claims except as otherwise agreed to between the parties. (marginal notation). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/12/2014.(CKM) |
Filing 44 NOTICE Proposed Order, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO, re #43 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 43 STIPULATION of Dismissal , filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO, Defendant CIRCLE CENTER MALL, LLC.. (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 42 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant CIRCLE CENTER MALL, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Brief in support of motion to dismiss second amended complaint)(Blair, Brian) |
Filing 41 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against CIRCLE CENTER MALL, LLC, filed by JILL CARUSO.(CKM) |
Filing 40 ORDER - The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [dkt. 30], and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [dkt. 30-1] shall be filed by the Clerk of the Court as of the date of this Order. The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [dkt. 27] as moot, without prejudice to its resubmission as appropriate, in light of the amendment of Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/9/2014. (CKM) |
Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Status Conference held on 1/7/2014. The parties discussed the status of and future plans for discovery. Status Conference set for 2/24/2014 at 10:30 AM in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. ***See Order For Additional Information***. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. (NLR) |
Filing 37 RESPONSE in Opposition re #30 MOTION to Amend/Correct #11 Amended Complaint , filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Blair, Brian) |
Filing 36 Preliminary Witness & Exhibit List (Corrected), filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC.(Blair, Brian) (Modified on 12/23/2013 (PGS) b/c of selection of wrong e-filing event). |
Filing 35 RESPONSE to Discovery Request from Circle Centre Mall, LLC, filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC.(Blair, Brian) Modified on 12/17/2013 (PGS)(includes Witness & Exhibit List). |
Filing 34 ORDER granting #33 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #27 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint to seven (7) days after this Court rules on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/16/2013. (MGG) |
Filing 33 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to to file response to #27 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint until 7 days after the Court rules on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 32 Plaintiff's Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO (Monismith, Pete) Modified on 12/13/2013 (CKM). |
Filing 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct #11 Amended Complaint , filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 31 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/7/2014 09:40 AM before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore (NOTE TIME CHANGE). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/10/2013.(CBU) |
Filing 29 EXHIBIT in Support of Motion re #27 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint , filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 28 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #27 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint , filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 27 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 26 MARGINAL ORDER re #25 Supplement to Case Management Plan - Accepted and entered as amended as an amendment to the parties' approved Case Management Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/18/2013.(JD) |
Filing 25 Submission Supplement to Case Management Plan, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO, Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 24 ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED - Discovery due by 8/23/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 9/16/2014. *SEE ORDER*. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/31/2013.(JD) |
Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 10/30/2013. The Court will approve the Case Management Plan, by separate order, with the changes to which the parties have agreed. In addition, the parties shall submit an electronic discovery protocol, including, at a minimum, the format in which electronically stored information will be produced and a clawback provision as proposed amendment to section III.K of the parties Case Management Plan, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Settlement Conference set for 6/23/2014 at 09:00 AM in room #257, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore., Status Conference set for 1/7/2014 at 10:30 AM in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. ***See Order For Additional Information***. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. (NLR) |
Filing 22 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO, Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC . (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 20 ORDER - granting #17 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Brian Blair for Circle Center Mall, LLC added. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/10/2013. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 19 RECEIPT #ip037652 for Pro Hac Vice fee for attorney Brian C. Blair fee in the amount of $30.00, paid by Landman Beatty Lawyers. (AAM) |
Filing 18 SUBMISSION Proposed Order filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) Modified on 10/10/2013 (CKM). |
Filing 17 MOTION for Attorney(s) Brian C. Blair to Appear pro hac vice (No fee paid with this filing), filed by Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affirmation of Brian Blair)(Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 16 ENTRY-marginal-Notice of dismissal without prej against AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (A Domestic Corporation) is acknowledged. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/2/2013.(CBU) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER - This matter is scheduled for a telephonic initial pretrial conference on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 4:20 p.m. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated phone number, to be provided by the court via email. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. *SEE ORDER*. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/26/2013.(JD) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald D. Levenhagen on behalf of Defendant Circle Center Mall, LLC. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Dismissal Without Prejudice Against Ames Development Company Inc., filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Circle Center Mall, LLC, filed by JILL CARUSO.(Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald D. Levenhagen on behalf of Defendant AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.. (Levenhagen, Donald) |
Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by JILL CARUSO. AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. served on 8/30/2013. (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 6 ORDER - granting #3 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/22/2013. (CKM) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (AAM) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Attorney(s) Pete M. Monismith to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $30, receipt number 0756-2779437), filed by Plaintiff JILL CARUSO. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly A. Gigli on behalf of Plaintiff JILL CARUSO. (Gigli, Kelly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ames Development Company, Inc., filed by JILL CARUSO. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-2779304) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Gigli, Kelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.