YOUNG v. PROVISION LIVING LLC

Defendant: PROVISION LIVING LLC
Plaintiff: CAROLYN YOUNG
Case Number: 1:2013cv01377
Filed: August 29, 2013
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 11, 2014 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting, but without prejudice 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ms. Young is granted leave to file an amended complaint, which is due on or before 7/31/2014. If no amended complaint is filed by this deadline the matter will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/11/2014 (dist made) (CBU)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. PROVISION LIVING LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PROVISION LIVING LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROLYN YOUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?