THOMPSON v. DR. JONES

THOMPSON v. DR. JONES

Plaintiff:	ROGER N. THOMPSON
Defendant:	DR. JONES
Case Number:	1:2013cv01566
Filed:	September 30, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 26, 2015	Filing 75 ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT DR. JONES' 63 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Mr. Thompson has not identified a genuine issue of material fact as to his claim that Dr. Jones was deliberately indifferent to his seri ous medical needs. Therefore, Dr. Jones' 63 motion for summary judgment is granted. Summary judgment was entered in favor of defendants Dr. Campbell and Dr. Burdine in the Entry of January 6, 2015. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry of January 6, 2015, shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/26/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
January 6, 2015	Filing 74 ENTRY Discussing Defendants Campbell and Burdine's Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. For the reasons explained in this ENTRY, the 50 motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Dr. Campbell and Dr . Burdine is GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Jones remains pending. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims dismissed in this Entry. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 26, 2015

Filing 75 ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT DR. JONES' 63 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Mr. Thompson has not identified a genuine issue of material fact as to his claim that Dr. Jones was deliberately indifferent to his seri ous medical needs. Therefore, Dr. Jones' 63 motion for summary judgment is granted. Summary judgment was entered in favor of defendants Dr. Campbell and Dr. Burdine in the Entry of January 6, 2015. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry of January 6, 2015, shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/26/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)

January 6, 2015

Filing 74 ENTRY Discussing Defendants Campbell and Burdine's Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. For the reasons explained in this ENTRY, the 50 motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Dr. Campbell and Dr . Burdine is GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Jones remains pending. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims dismissed in this Entry. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMPSON v. DR. JONES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DR. JONES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROGER N. THOMPSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?