ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
| GULF UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| CITY OF KOKOMO and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2013cv01573 |
| October 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER. The Court DENIES Travelers' Motion for Reconsideration or, In the Alternative, For Certification of Certain Rulings in the Court's Order on Travelers' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 136.] The parties should diligently work to avoid further extensions of time of the recently extended Case Management Deadlines. [Filing No. 147.] SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/25/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' 94 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Pollution Exclusions and Landfill Endorsements. [Filing No. 94.] The Court denie s summary judgment with regard to Travelers' request regarding the pollution exclusions in the insurance policies at issue, after concluding that, pursuant to applicable Indiana law, the definition of "pollutant" in those policies i s ambiguous and, thus, must be construed against Travelers. The Court also denies Travelers' request for summary judgment on the landfill endorsements in the insurance policies at issue, finding that a disputed issue of material fact exists r egarding their applicability to the Underlying Environmental Matter. The Court asks the assigned Magistrate Judge to address the impact of this ruling on the further development of this action at the July 22, 2015 status conference already scheduled. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/25/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER: Accordingly, the City is ORDERED TO FILE A REPORT by August 25, 2014, explaining the basis for the changed representations in its Answer regarding the parties' citizenship. Should the City wish to amend jurisdictional responses in its A nswer, its report should attach a proposed Amended Answer. Defendant Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina is cautioned to keep these principles in mind to avoid the Court issuing a similar entry after it files its answer ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/13/2014. Copy sent via US Mail.(DW)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER TO FILE JOINT JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT: The Court ORDERS all of the parties to meet and confer, and conduct whatever investigation necessary, to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by December 16, 2013 setting forth the basis for each of their citizenships and whe ther they agree that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. If the parties cannot agree on their respective citizenships or the amount in controversy, any party who disagrees shall file a separate jurisdictional statement by December 16, 2013 setting forth its view regarding the citizenship of each of the parties and the amount in controversy (see Order for additional information). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/5/2013.(SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
