WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
| TERRY P. WILLIAMS |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2013cv01605 |
| October 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/4/2014.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Plaintiff Terry Williams ("Williams") requests judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying his application for Suppleme ntal Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act ("the Act"). See 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 1382c(a)(3). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court REVERSE the decision of the Commissioner and R EMAND the matter for further proceedings. The Court should find that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ's determination that Williams is not disabled. The District Judge should therefore REVERSE and REMAND the matter to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/18/2014.(MGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
