MONARCH BEVERAGE CO., INC. v. HUSKEY et al
MONARCH BEVERAGE CO., INC. |
MELISSA COXEY, DALE GRUBB, ALEX HUSKEY and DAVID JOHNSON |
1:2013cv01674 |
October 21, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
William T. Lawrence |
Constitutional - State Statute |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 ORDER - ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; Defendants' motion for summary judgment Docket No. 79 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment Docket No. 93 is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for oral argument Docket No. 96 is also DENIED. Final Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/30/2015. (CKM) |
Filing 97 ORDER denying Indiana Beverage Alliance's 83 Motion for Leave to appear as Amicus Curiae and to file brief in support of the State and granting Amicus Wine & Spirits Distributors of Indiana's 86 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curia e brief in support of Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Wine & Spirits Distributors of Indiana's Amicus Curiae Brief shall be filed by the Clerk of the Court as of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/11/2014. (CBU) |
Filing 63 ENTRY denying Wine & Spirits Distributors of Indiana's 22 Motion to Intervene (see Entry for details). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/20/2014. (SWM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.