CHARLES v. CORIZON

CHARLES v. CORIZON

Plaintiff:	ELMER D. CHARLES
Defendant:	CORIZON
Case Number:	1:2013cv01820
Filed:	November 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 15, 2014	Filing 24 ENTRY granting Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment (see Entry). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/15/2014. (SWM)
February 24, 2014	Filing 20 ENTRY: The plaintiff's filing of February 20, 2014, shall be treated as his response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The defendant's reply shall be filed not later than March 7, 2014. In his response, the plaintiff asserts that prison staff have prevented him from completing the administrative remedy process. In addition to asserting that arg ument, he requests that he be given additional time to complete the administrative remedy process. The plaintiff's motion for extension of time to complete exhaustion [dkt. 19] is denied because &q uot;[a] prisoner may not file a lawsuit before exhausting his administrative remedies, even if he exhausts those remedies while the litigation is pending." Cannon v. Washington, 418 F.3d 714, 719 (7th Cir. 2005). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/24/2014. (SWM)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 15, 2014

Filing 24 ENTRY granting Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment (see Entry). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/15/2014. (SWM)

February 24, 2014

Filing 20 ENTRY: The plaintiff's filing of February 20, 2014, shall be treated as his response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The defendant's reply shall be filed not later than March 7, 2014. In his response, the plaintiff asserts that prison staff have prevented him from completing the administrative remedy process. In addition to asserting that arg ument, he requests that he be given additional time to complete the administrative remedy process. The plaintiff's motion for extension of time to complete exhaustion [dkt. 19] is denied because &q uot;[a] prisoner may not file a lawsuit before exhausting his administrative remedies, even if he exhausts those remedies while the litigation is pending." Cannon v. Washington, 418 F.3d 714, 719 (7th Cir. 2005). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/24/2014. (SWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHARLES v. CORIZON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELMER D. CHARLES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CORIZON
Represented By:	Randall A. Juip
Represented By:	Anthony D. Pignotti
Represented By:	Mark G. Reynolds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?