REYNOLDS v. HAYS

REYNOLDS v. HAYS

Plaintiff:	JARROD REYNOLDS
Defendant:	BRETT HAYS
Case Number:	1:2014cv00749
Filed:	May 13, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 19, 2014	Filing 6 ENTRY Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment: The plaintiff filed this civil action against his former criminal defense counsel for violating his constitutional rights. The Entry of May 1 4, 2014, gave the plaintiff a period of time to show cause why Judgment consistent with that Entry should not issue. The plaintiff responded with a motion to show cause or to file an amended complaint. That motion [dkt. 5] is denied because it does not correct the deficiencies noted in the Entry of May 14, 2014, and under these circumstances any amendments to the complaint would be futile (see Entry for additional information). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/19/2014.(SWM)
May 14, 2014	Filing 4 ENTRY and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is granted. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is not feasible at this time. For the reasons explaine d in this Entry, however, this action appears to be subject to dismissal. Reynold's complaint is now subject to the screening requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Reynolds shall have through June 10, 2014, in w hich to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See Luevano v. Wal- Mart Stores, Inc., 722 F.3d 1014, 1022 (7th Cir. 2013). See Entry for additional information. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2014. (SWM)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 19, 2014

Filing 6 ENTRY Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment: The plaintiff filed this civil action against his former criminal defense counsel for violating his constitutional rights. The Entry of May 1 4, 2014, gave the plaintiff a period of time to show cause why Judgment consistent with that Entry should not issue. The plaintiff responded with a motion to show cause or to file an amended complaint. That motion [dkt. 5] is denied because it does not correct the deficiencies noted in the Entry of May 14, 2014, and under these circumstances any amendments to the complaint would be futile (see Entry for additional information). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/19/2014.(SWM)

May 14, 2014

Filing 4 ENTRY and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is granted. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is not feasible at this time. For the reasons explaine d in this Entry, however, this action appears to be subject to dismissal. Reynold's complaint is now subject to the screening requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Reynolds shall have through June 10, 2014, in w hich to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See Luevano v. Wal- Mart Stores, Inc., 722 F.3d 1014, 1022 (7th Cir. 2013). See Entry for additional information. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2014. (SWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REYNOLDS v. HAYS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JARROD REYNOLDS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: BRETT HAYS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?