COLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
| BRITTANY COLEY |
| MIKE ABELL, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, KATHLEEN LANDRUM and HIWOT SEIFU |
| 1:2014cv00956 |
| June 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ENTRY Granting Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - The defendants' 113 motion for summary judgment is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/15/2016. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. (GSO)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER OVERRULES Coley's 110 objection to the Magistrate's Order denying the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of an order denying Coley permission to serve a subpoena on a property owner to inspect certain premises. Coley's request for a subpoena to inspect certain premises is denied. (S.E.). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/4/2016. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
79
ENTRY Discussing Motions to Amend. The motions to amend filed on June 5, 2015 [dkt 65] and June 12, 2015 [dkt 68] are each denied as moot. The motion to amend filed on July 8, 2015 [dkt 70] is granted. The following claims shall proceed: (1) The cl aim that defendants Kathleen Landrum, Mike Abell, and Hiwot Seifu violated Ms. Coley's rights to procedural and substantive due process when removing her children from her custody. (2) The claim that defendants Kathleen Landrum, Mike Abell, a nd Hiwot Seifu violated Ms. Coley's rights Fourth Amendment rights when removing her children from her custody without a court order. The defendants have already appeared in this action. They shall have through August 14, 2015, in which to fi le an answer to the Second Amended Complaint. Any party seeking additional time for discovery to file dispositive motions based on the rulings in this Entry shall have through August 14, 2015, in which to file a motion requesting such relief. The clerk shall file and docket the proposed amended complaint (dkt 70-1) as the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/22/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
