MACIAS v. HYATT CORPORATION

MACIAS v. HYATT CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	ROBERT MACIAS
Defendant:	HYATT CORPORATION
Case Number:	1:2014cv01029
Filed:	June 20, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 14, 2014	Filing 11 ORDER - For these reasons herin, the parties are ORDERED to file an Amended Joint Jurisdictional Statement on or before July 23, 2014, setting forth whether the amount in controversy exceeds "$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.". Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/14/2014.(JKS)
June 26, 2014	Filing 8 ORDER to File Joint Jurisdictional Statement - Having reviewed Defendant's Notice of Removal, the Court cannot assure itself that it can exercise diversity jurisdiction over this matter. Because Defendant's Notice of Removal is deficient in this respects, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by July 10, 20 14 setting forth the parties' citizenships and the amount in controversy. If the parties cannot agree on their citizenships or the amount in controversy, they are ordered to file competing jurisdictional statements by July 10, 2014 setting forth their positions. The joint jurisdictional statement, or competing jurisdictional statement, shall satisfy Plaintiff's obligations under Local Rule 81-1. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2014.(JKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 14, 2014

Filing 11 ORDER - For these reasons herin, the parties are ORDERED to file an Amended Joint Jurisdictional Statement on or before July 23, 2014, setting forth whether the amount in controversy exceeds "$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.". Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/14/2014.(JKS)

June 26, 2014

Filing 8 ORDER to File Joint Jurisdictional Statement - Having reviewed Defendant's Notice of Removal, the Court cannot assure itself that it can exercise diversity jurisdiction over this matter. Because Defendant's Notice of Removal is deficient in this respects, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by July 10, 20 14 setting forth the parties' citizenships and the amount in controversy. If the parties cannot agree on their citizenships or the amount in controversy, they are ordered to file competing jurisdictional statements by July 10, 2014 setting forth their positions. The joint jurisdictional statement, or competing jurisdictional statement, shall satisfy Plaintiff's obligations under Local Rule 81-1. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2014.(JKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MACIAS v. HYATT CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: HYATT CORPORATION
Represented By:	William J. Horvath
Represented By:	Jeffrey D. Hawkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT MACIAS
Represented By:	Robert W. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?