DEGOLYER et al v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
LISA DEGOLYER and CONSUELA CAPPS |
MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT J. DOWNEY and NICHOLAS TANKERSLEY |
1:2014cv01288 |
August 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: all claims against Sheriff Robert Downey, all claims asserted against the Morgan County Sheriff's Department under state law for punitive damages and attorney fees, and all Section 1983 claims against all Defendants. The claims that remain are the Plaintiffs' state law claims against the Morgan County Sheriff's Department and Nicholas Tankersley. Because the Section 1983 claims, which are the only clai ms that provided for subject matter jurisdiction over this case, have been dismissed, and because this action has not significantly progressed, the Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). This action is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A separate entry of final judgment shall issue as this court lacks jurisdiction. Copy Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/21/2015.(MGG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.