RED BARN MOTORS, INC. et al v. NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. et al
| RED BARN MOTORS, INC., BARBARA A. RICHARDSON and DONALD B. RICHARDSON |
| LOUISIANA'S FIRST CHOICE AUTO AUCTION, L.L.C. and NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. |
| 1:2014cv01589 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
315
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - For the reasons stated above, the Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Proposed Order and Reasons (Filing No. 302 ) and Motion to Strike (Filing No. 299 ) are GRANTED, NextGear's Motion to Decertify Class (Fi ling No. 295 ) is DENIED, NextGear's Motion to Modify Class Certification Order to Narrow Class (Filing No. 286 ) is GRANTED, NextGear's Alternative Motion to Modify Class Certification Order to Narrow Class (Filing No. 306 ) is DENIE D, NextGear's Motion to Stay Discovery and Class Notice (Filing No. 285 ) and Objections to Magistrate Judge's Orders (Filing No. 287 ; Filing No. 288 ) are DENIED as moot, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Revise Class Definition and Proceed with Class Notice (Filing No. 276 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/26/2020. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
264
ORDER - 218 Motion in Limine is denied as to the expert opinions of Dan Wojcik. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/19/2018. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
261
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion to Reconsider (Filing No. 228 ) and decertifies the Plaintiffs' breach of contract and RICO claims. This litigation will no longer proceed as a class action. The Court DENIES as moot the Defendants' Motion to Narrow Class (Filing No. 237 ), the Defendants' Objections to Magistrate Judge's Orders (Filing No. 240 ; Filing No. 255 ), and the Plaintiffs'Motion to Proceed with Class Notice (Filing No. 249 ). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/12/2018. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY - 183 Motion in Limine is DENIED. An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. Evidentiary rulings regarding Hoffman's anticipated testimony are deferred until t rial so that questions of foundation, relevancy, and prejudice can be resolved in context. If the parties believe that specific evidence is inadmissible during the course of the trial, counsel may raise specific objections to that evidence. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/2/2017. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
223
ENTRY denying Plaintiffs' 205 Motion to Strike Defendants' Notice of Additional Authority. See Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/29/2017. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 126 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim and constructive fraud claim ag ainst NextGear survive the Motion to Dismiss. The substantive RICO claim against NextGear, Cox Automotive, and Mr. Wick also survives dismissal. The claims for RICO conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference are dismissed. The Court concludes, however, that these dismissals should be with without prejudice. Fed. R., Civ. P. 15 directs that courts should "freely" grant leave to amend a pleading "when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (a)(2). If in fac t, Plaintiffs' can plead sufficient facts to support their claims for RICO conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference they are granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Entry. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2017. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER denying 119 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 5/2/2016. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS NextGear's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim [dkt. 10 ] is DENIED and that First Choice's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted, or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss the Individual Plaintiffs and Motion for a More Definite Statement [dkt. 12 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/13/2016.(TRG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
