ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. NANG KUANG PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY |
| CANDA NX-2, LLC and NANG KUANG PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. |
| 1:2014cv01647 |
| October 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/24/2015. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
54
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY - The Court finds that there is already sufficient evidence in the record for Plaintiffs to respond to the motion to dismiss, as Plaintiffs are already in possession of Defendants' ANDA. The additi onal discovery requested by Plaintiffs would essentially amount to a fishing expedition into issues unrelated to the question of whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over Nang Kuang and CANDA. Plaintiff's Motion for Jurisdictional Disco very and to Stay Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 33 ) is therefore DENIED.1 Plaintiffs shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry to file their response to Defendants' motion to dismiss, and Defendants' reply brief shall be due within seven (7) days after service of Plaintiffs' response brief. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/15/2015. (MGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
