INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS FUND v. SCHENKEL AND SONS INC et al
MARK MCGRIFF and WILLIAM NIX |
SCHENKEL AND SONS INC and SCHENKEL CONSTRUCTION INC. |
1:2014cv01742 |
October 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES - The case and controversy between the Fund and Schenkel was fully resolved by the arbitrator's decision, thereby mooting this litigation and depriving this Court of jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Schenkel's Motion to Dismiss and Request for Attorneys' Fees (Filing No. 42 ). For the reasons explained in the arbitrator's decision, see Filing No. 43-1 at 20-22, the Court declines to award Schenkel its attorney fees, as requested in its Motion to Dismiss. Final judgment will issue under separate order. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/23/2017. (JLS) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 33 Motion to Stay this lawsuit pending the outcome of the arbitration. The court STAYS adjudication of Construction's potential joint liability with Sons for interim withdrawal payments. The Fund may, if desired, seek relief from the court against Sons with respect to interim withdrawal payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/13/2015. (BGT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.