THOMPSON et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
||JAMIE JOHNSON and FAMOUS THOMPSON
||CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MICHAEL MARTIN, JASON ROSS and BRYAN ZOTZ
||January 16, 2015
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Tim A. Baker
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 11, 2017
ORDER - Defendants moved the Court to preclude or limit the testimony of twelve witnesses disclosed as experts by the Plaintiffs for their failure to comply with the disclosure requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(2) (2). For the foll owing reason, Defendants' Motion is DENIED. Plaintiffs are ordered to supplement the disclosure statements regarding the experts they intend to call as witnesses for trial by January 25, 2017. Specifically, Plaintiffs shall provide treating ph ysician disclosures which state the actual opinion the witness will offer at trial and summary of facts supporting the opinion of each expert witness. In addition, Plaintiffs shall provide the curriculum vitae of each expert they intend to call as a witness at trial by January 25, 2017. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/11/2017. (JLS)
|September 22, 2016
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the aforementioned reasons, the Court DENIES the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 42 ). **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/22/2016. (JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?