KELLY v. PERSON et al
RICHARD L. KELLY |
MANDIP BARTELS, KELLY COUNSELOR, JANE DOE, MIKE MITCHEFF, MIKE PERSON, RANNA STOOPS and JOE THOMPSON |
1:2015cv00400 |
March 10, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER granting 20 Motion to show cause and the Court vacates the final judgment issued on May 14, 2015. Count III of the complaint is dismissed as duplicative of those in 1:14-cv-1364. Counts I and IV of the complaint are dismissed as duplicativ e. Discovery is ongoing in that case, so to the extent Mr. Kelly wishes to add defendants or allegations of additional pain, he must request permission to do so in that case. The clerk is directed to docket a copy of this Entry in 1:14-cv-1364. Co unt II of the complaint are dismissed as duplicative. Mr. Kelly's claims are all dismissed as duplicative. This dismissal is without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/8/2015. (CBU) |
Filing 16 ENTRY Dismissing Case for Failure to Show Cause. This action is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of those cases. Judgment consistent with this entry shall now issue. (S.E.). Copy to plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/14/2015.(MAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.