NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INTEGRITY, INC. v. REESE
| NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INTEGRITY, INC. |
| DEVON C. REESE |
| 1:2015cv00545 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL - For the reasons stated above, the Court finds against the Estate on their claim for reformation and in favor of National Foundation on their defense of laches. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue in a separate order. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/21/2017.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER granting in part 92 Motion for Protective Order. The Court orders that the deposition of Erin Ostmann shall not be conducted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 12/20/2016. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
81
ENTRY ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY - For the aforementioned reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part National Foundation's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 54 ). The Cour t DENIES Reese's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 66 ), and DENIES National Foundation's Motion for Leave to File Sur- Reply (Filing No. 74 ). The Court agrees that the pertinent sections of the trust agreement are unambiguous and that National Foundation has complied with the plain language of the trust documents; however, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding Givens' intent and whether equity in the form of reformation should intervene. On the d efense of laches, the Court concludes that there remains a genuine issue of material fact as to inexcusable delay, to an implied waiver and prejudice. The issues remaining for trial are the following: 1. Reese's counterclaim for reformation. 2. National Foundations defense of laches as to the counterclaim. (See order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/26/2016. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
47
ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM - Before the Court is Plaintiff National Foundation for Special Needs Integrity, Inc's. ("National Foundation"), Motion to Dismiss the Defendant's Amended Counterclaim (Filing No. 27), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (See order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/5/2016. (JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INTEGRITY, INC. v. REESE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INTEGRITY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Suzanne R. Gaidoo |
| Represented By: | David W. Gray |
| Represented By: | Matthew S. Tarkington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DEVON C. REESE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
