H.E. MCGONICAL INC. v. HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: H.E. MCGONICAL INC.
Defendant: COREPOINTE INSURANCE COMPANY and HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2015cv00549
Filed: April 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CERTIFIY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL - For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES McGonigal's Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appear (Filing No. 84 ). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/5/2017. (JLS)
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ENTRY DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER - McGonigal's motion to reconsider demonstrates his disappointment in the Court's two dismissal Orders (Filing No. 41 ; Filing No. 68 ), and the Order denying leave to amend the Compl aint (Filing No. 66 ), not a manifest error of law or fact that would warrant alteration of or amendment to the challenged orders. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, McGonigal's Motion to Reconsider (Filing No. 69 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/18/2017. (JLS)
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER ON DEFENDANT COREPOINTE'S MOTION TO DISMISS - For the foregoing reasons, CorePointe's Motion to Dismiss Count IV of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Filing No. 45) is GRANTED pursuant to Rule 12(c). The claim for insuran ce bad faith against CorePointe, Count IV of McGonigal's Complaint, is dismissed. Because of McGonigal's delay and lack of diligence in pursuing its claim and the potential prejudice to Defendants, as discussed more fully in the Court's Order denying McGonigal's Motion to Amend the Complaint ( Filing No. 66), Count IV of the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/31/2016. (JLS)
October 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss. The claim for insurance bad faith against Harleysville, Count II of McGonigal's Complaint, is dismissed without prejudice. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/26/2015. (GSO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: H.E. MCGONICAL INC. v. HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COREPOINTE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Edward F. Harney, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Timothy V. Hoffman
Represented By: John J. Piegore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H.E. MCGONICAL INC.
Represented By: Joseph Andrew Samreta
Represented By: Richard Robert Skiles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?