GOLDEN v. INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY

Plaintiff: MARYTZA GOLDEN
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY
Case Number: 1:2015cv00766
Filed: May 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 CLOSED - FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/23/2017.(TMD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOLDEN v. INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARYTZA GOLDEN
Represented By: Ryan C. Fox
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Sink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY
Represented By: Kathleen Ann DeLaney
Represented By: Mark J. Plantan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?