HURT v. THE COUNTRY OF GERMANY et al
| TYRONE HURT |
| ILLEGIBLE DEFENDANT and THE COUNTRY OF GERMANY |
| 1:2015cv00939 |
| June 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ENTRY Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment. This action was filed by Tyrone Hurt (a/k/a Tyrone Hunt) a citizen of the District of Columbia. The defendants are The Country of Germany and two illegible defendants. The plaintiff 9;s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is denied because he has failed to demonstrate that he is eligible to proceed in that fashion. As previously mentioned in Hunt v. Hinson, 1:14-cv-1781-TWP-TAB (S.D. Ind.November 5, 2014), th e PACER Case Locator reflects that Mr. Hurt is a frequent filer of frivolous litigation under both the surnames Hurt and Hunt. See Hurt v. Paige, No. 13-1412 (7th Cir. Apr. 5, 2013); Hurt v. D.C. Government, No. 13-1413 (7th Cir. Apr. 5, 2013). He h as had filing restrictions placed upon him by the federal courts for the District of Columbia, the Eastern District of California and the District of Massachusetts for filing vexatious litigation. See Hurt v. D.C. Parole Board, 13-11800-DJC (D. Ma ss. November 20, 2013) (discussing filing restrictions). The complaint in this case is almost entirely illegible, and to the extent it is not, the claims and allegations are frivolous. Therefore, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which rel ief may be granted and is otherwise frivolous. On these grounds, the complaint is subject to dismissal. See Hoskins v. Poelstra, 320 F.3d 761, 762 (7th Cir. 2003) ("District judges have ample authority to dismiss frivolous or transparently de fective suits spontaneously, and thus save everyone time and legal expense."). The plaintiff's recent submissions in other cases in this district reflect that the opportunity to file a legible complaint would not bear fruit. See Hurt v. United States of America, Cause No. 1:14-cv-01846-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind. Dec. 9, 2014) (failed to file legible amended complaint after being given opportunity to do so), Hurt v. United States House of Representatives, Cause No. 1:14-cv-01847-JMS-DKL ( illegible complaint filed), Hurt v. United States of America, Cause No. 1:14-cv-01866-LJM-TAB (illegible complaint filed). Accordingly, this action is dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/17/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
