WENDEL v. INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC. et al
| DAWN M. WENDEL |
| INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC. and RODNEY MANN |
| 1:2015cv01241 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE, PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS AND ON DAWN M. WENDEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMSL: The Defendants' motio n for judgment on the pleadings as to Wendel's Title VII claim against the Board of Directors and its individual members and her tortious interference claim against Mann is GRANTED. Those claims are therefore DISMISSED. Because the re are no other claims asserted against them, these Defendants are dismissed from this case. Wendel's motion to dismiss Indiana Masonic Home, Inc.'s counterclaims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. The case shall proce ed on Wendel's only remaining claim, her Title VII discrimination claim against Indiana Masonic Home, Inc., and on Indiana Masonic Home, Inc.'s counterclaims against Wendel ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/2/2016. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
