ADAMS v. RENAISSANCE RX et al
| MELANIE ADAMS |
| TERRY DOUGLAS, BARRY GRIFFITH, TARUN JOLLY, RENAISSANCE RX, PATRICK RIDGEWAY, TPG GROWTH, LLC and UTC LABORATORIES, LLC |
| 1:2015cv01401 |
| September 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART UTC's Motion for Summary Judgment, 52 . Specifically, the Court DENIES AS MOOT UTC's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Ms. Adams' retaliatory discharge cla im under the Indiana Anti-Kickback Statute; GRANTS UTC's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Ms. Adams' sex dis-crimination and harassment claims under Title VII and her harassment claim under the ADEA; and DENIES UTC's Motion for Summar y Judgment as to Ms. Adams' discrimination claim under the ADEA. No partial final judgment shall issue. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties to address the possibility of an agreed resolution, or to establish a schedule for the upcoming July 10, 2017 trial. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/19/2017. (JRB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
