BOCHNER v. SUPERINTENDENT

BOCHNER v. SUPERINTENDENT

Petitioner:	JOHN BOCHNER
Respondent:	SUPERINTENDENT
Case Number:	1:2015cv01764
Filed:	November 9, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 12, 2017	Filing 27 ENTRY and Order Dismissing Action - The respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition as Moot [Dkt. 25 ] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/12/2017.(JLS)
March 3, 2017	Filing 24 ENTRY DISCUSSING NEED FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING OR VACATION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS - Consistent with this, the motion for leave to file a belated reply [dkt 22 ] is granted. The respondent has through March 24, 2017, in which to inform the Co urt how this action should proceed. If a hearing is necessary, the Court will appoint counsel, schedule the hearing, and set discovery deadlines by separate order. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/3/2017. (JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 12, 2017

Filing 27 ENTRY and Order Dismissing Action - The respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition as Moot [Dkt. 25 ] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/12/2017.(JLS)

March 3, 2017

Filing 24 ENTRY DISCUSSING NEED FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING OR VACATION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS - Consistent with this, the motion for leave to file a belated reply [dkt 22 ] is granted. The respondent has through March 24, 2017, in which to inform the Co urt how this action should proceed. If a hearing is necessary, the Court will appoint counsel, schedule the hearing, and set discovery deadlines by separate order. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/3/2017. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOCHNER v. SUPERINTENDENT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHN BOCHNER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Represented By:	Marjorie H. Lawyer-Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?