JUSTICE, SR. v. LIEBEL et al
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR. |
JERRY HUSTON, JAIL COMMANDER, DAVID LIEBEL, MARION COUNTY JAIL, MICHELLE METCALF, RON NEAL, KAREN RICHARDS and WILLIAM WILSON |
1:2015cv01776 |
November 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ENTRY - 49 Motion to Clarify this Court's Previous Order is denied. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/29/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ) |
Filing 14 ENTRY Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The RUILPA claim against defendant Liebel may proceed in this action. All other claims and defendants are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Justise shall have throug h January 8, 2016, to show cause why the claims in Section III (C) and (E) should not be dismissed from this action. Justise shall have through January 8, 2016, to notify the Court whether he believes he has asserted any claim in his complaint whic h has not been discussed in this Entry. Defendant Liebel has already appeared in this action. He shall have thirty days from the date of this Entry to file an answer. No partial judgment shall enter at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/9/2015.(JLS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.