SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. SMILEY BODY SHOP, INC. et al
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
GREG CALLAHAN, JEFFREY SMILEY and SMILEY BODY SHOP, INC. |
1:2016cv00062 |
January 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 142 ORDER - The Court DENIES AS MOOT Selective's Motion for Summary Judgment, 88 , and Cincinnati's Motion for Summary Judgment, 93 , as those motions relate to coverage for SBS. All claims against SBS are DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE SBS as a party. No partial final judgment shall issue. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Selective's Motion for Summary Judgment, 88 , SBS's and Mr. Smiley's Motion for Summary Judgment, 90 , and Cincinnati 39;s Motion for Summary Judgment, 93 , as set forth above in detail. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties to address the possibility of an agreed resolution, or to establish a schedule for the upcoming August 28, 2017 trial. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/26/2017. (JRB) |
Filing 82 ORDER denying Jeffrey Smiley and Smiley Body Shop, Inc.'s 76 Motion for Protective Order or, in the Alternative, to Stay Discovery. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/27/2016. (SWM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.