GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
||CORIZON, DAVID HINCHMAN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON and JULIE MURPHY
||January 12, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Mark J. Dinsmore
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 6, 2017
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons stated herein, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 36 , is GRANTED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/6/2017. (MAC)
|April 5, 2016
ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Any claim against the Indiana Department of Corrections or the Indiana Women's Prison must be dismissed because the Eleventh Amendment immunity bars suits against states and their agencies regardless of the relief sought, whether damages or injunctive relief. The plaintiff's claims against Julie Murphy, David Hinchman, and Corizon, shall proceed as claims that these defendants exhibited deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Murphy, Hinchman, and Corizon in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copies to Parties via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/5/2016.(JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?