ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY |
| DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. |
| 1:2016cv00308 |
| February 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING FEBRUARY 1, 2018 BENCH TRIAL -Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Court concludes that Lilly has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the asserted claims of the '209 Patent would be infringed by Dr. Reddy's product under the doctrine of equivalents based upon inducement and contributory infringement. The Court finds that Dr. Reddy's product indirectly infringes the asserted claims of the & #039;209 Patent, and finds in favor of Eli Lilly And Company and against Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. Final judgment shall issue separate from this Entry. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/22/2018.(NAD)
|
|
Filing
216
ENTRY - 213 Motion to Amend/Correct is granted in part. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/12/2018. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
199
ENTRY - 132 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Lilly's literal infringement and doctrine of equivalents claims remain pending for trial. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/14/2017. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
154
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE NEW ARGUMENTS IN PLAINTIFF'S REPLY - This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, LTD's and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.' ;s (collectively, "DRL") Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Reports Served On Defendants On March 21, 2017 (Filing No. 74 ), and Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company's ("Lilly") Objections to Order on Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Reports ("the Order") (Filing No. 97 ). Also before the Court is a Motion to Strike New Arguments in Plaintiff's Reply That Were Neither Raised in its Objections nor Made to the Magistr ate Judge (Filing No. 112 ). The Court SUSTAINS Lilly's Objection to Order to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Reports (Filing No. 97 ) in its entirety. In addition, the Court DENIES DRL's Motion to Strike New Arguments in Pla intiff's Reply Brief (Filing No. 112 ). The Court specifically concludes that Lilly disclosed in its infringement contention the information contained in paragraphs 38-47, 60- 61, 63-73, and 77-82 of Dr. Chabner's report, as well as para graphs 15 and 16 of Dr. Pinal's report. The Court also concludes that DRL is not prejudiced by the inclusion of Lilly's expert reports and that the CMP did not provide sufficient notice that September 6, 2016 amounted to the "final" contentions' deadline. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/6/2017. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
96
ENTRY and ORDER on Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Reports [doc. 74]: DRL's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Reports [doc. 74] is granted. The f ollowing portions of the Chabner Report, dated March 21, 2017, attached as Appendix 1 to the sealed proposed order found at ECF No. 76, are stricken. See Entry. It is ordered that Lilly not argue or introduce evidence regarding the stricken infringement contentions, opinions, and underlying bases therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 4/28/2017. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
