BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff: MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant: BARBARA L. BRUGNAUX, KATHRYN H. BURROUGHS, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT, MICHAEL J. JENUWINE, JOHN AND JANE DOES, GARY K. KEMPER, JON B. LARAMORE, JEFFRY A. LIND, CATHLEEN M. SHRADER, SHELICE R. TOLBERT, CHARLOTTE F. WESTERHAUS-RENFROW and MICHAEL M. YODER
Case Number: 1:2016cv00391
Filed: January 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 62 Motion to Stay Younger Abstention Ruling for lack of subject matter jurisdiction all of the Plaintiff's claims in the Third Amended Complaint, except for his claim regarding the consti tutionality of Admission and Discipline Rule 2.1, as to which judgment will be entered as a matter of law in favor of the Defendants. DENIES the Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration Dkt. No. 39 (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/17/2017. (JDC)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Reconsideration For Leave to the third amended complaint; denying as moot 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Hearing set for 10/26/2017 at 10:00 AM in room #202, United States Cou rthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge William T. Lawrence. If any party believes more time is needed, it should file a notice with the Court within seven days of the date of this Entry. On or before Thursday, October 12, 2017, the parties shall file lists of the witnesses and exhibits they intend to present at the hearing Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/21/2017. (JDC)
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ENTRY Regarding Jurisdiction. Defendants Indiana State Board of Law Examiners - Barbara L. Brugnaux, Michael M. Yoder, Jon B. Laramore, Gary K. Kemper, Charlotte F. Westerhaus-Renfrow, Michael J. Jenuwine, Kathryn H. Burroughs, Jeffry A. Lind, an d Shelice R. Tolbert - and John and Jane Does of the Indiana State Board of Law Examiners are DISMISSED as defendants in this action. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket to indicate that the State ex rel. Indiana Supreme Court is the only re maining defendant in this matter. The State is directed to respond to the claims remaining in the Second Amended Complaint, specifically, the Plaintiff's claims regarding the constitutionality of the bar examination and Admission and Discipline Rule 2.1, by no later than 21 days from the date of this Entry. This response may, of course, be in the form of an answer or a motion to dismiss. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/13/2017.(MAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARBARA L. BRUGNAUX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHRYN H. BURROUGHS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS
Represented By: Joshua Robert Lowry
Represented By: Jefferson S. Garn
Represented By: Philip Alan Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
Represented By: Joshua Robert Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. JENUWINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARY K. KEMPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JON B. LARAMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFFRY A. LIND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CATHLEEN M. SHRADER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHELICE R. TOLBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLOTTE F. WESTERHAUS-RENFROW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL M. YODER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?