CAMPBELL v. USA
Petitioner: LON CAMPBELL
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2016cv00508
Filed: March 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Entry Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - The foregoing circumstances show that Mr. Campbell is not entitled to relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion for relief purs uant to § 2255 is therefore denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. This Entry shall also be entered on the docket in the underlying criminal action, No. 1:13-cr-00185-TWP-DML-18. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Pr ocedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court finds that Mr. Campbell has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find it "debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/2/2017.(JLS)
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENTRY Discussing Petitioner's Objection to Order Granting Respondent Time - Respondent's request for 60 days within which to prepare a response is reasonable and the Court must allowing the Respondent a reasonable amount of time to respo nd to Petitioner's claims. In sum, Petitioner has not presented any persuasive grounds to put this case on an expedited schedule. His objection to the order granting the Respondent additional time to respond to his motion to vacate [DKT. 8] is overruled. Petitioner's request for "one more chance" can best be considered by the Court once he begins supervised release. Petitioner explains that he previously "did four years on supervised release without any violations." Good performance while on supervised release can be rewarded with modification of the terms, including early termination. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/28/2016.(JLS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAMPBELL v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LON CAMPBELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Cynthia J. Ridgeway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?