TESLER v. MILLER HOWARD INVESTMENTS, INC
Plaintiff: ERIC S TESLER
Defendant: MILLER HOWARD INVESTMENTS, INC
Case Number: 1:2016cv00640
Filed: March 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Matthew P. Brookman
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE - For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES Miller/Howard's First Motion in Limine (Filing No. 130 ) and GRANTS its Second Motion in Limine (Filing No. 131 ), as to settlement discussions or severance negotiations only. An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. If the parties believe that evidence excluded by this Order becomes relevant or otherwise admissible during the course of trial, counsel may approach and request a hearing ou tside the presence of the jury. Likewise, if the parties believe that specific evidence is inadmissible during the course of the trial, counsel may raise specific objections to that evidence. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/13/2019. (NAD)
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER - For the reasons set forth above, Miller/Howard's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Entry on its Motion for Summary Judgment, (Filing No. 118 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is gr anted in that the Court's Entry on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 111 ) is modified to reflect that Tesler's breach of contract claim is subject to the two-year statute of limitation period established by Indiana Code § 34-11-2-1, not the six-year statute of limitation period contained in Indiana Code § 34-11-2-9. In all other respects the motion is denied. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/1/2019. (MAT)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S 84 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the foregoing reasons, Miller/Howard's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 84) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Summary judgment is granted on Tesler's claims for unjust enrichment (Count III), negligence (Count V), and breach of fiduciary duty (Count VI), and these claims are DISMISSED. Summary Judgment is denied on Tesler's breach of contract claim (Count VIII), which claim may proceed to trial. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/4/2019. (NAD)
July 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED OMPLAINT - 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: Miller/Howard's Motion to Dismiss Tesler's Indi ana's Wage Claims Act violation (Counts I), Indiana's Wage Payment Act violation (Count II), conversion (Count IV), and fraud (Count VII) claims is GRANTED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Miller/Howard's Motion to Dismiss Tesler's claims for unjust enrichment (Count III), negligence (Count V), breach of fiduciary duty (Count VI), and breach of contract (Count VIII) is DENIED. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/3/2017. (LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TESLER v. MILLER HOWARD INVESTMENTS, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MILLER HOWARD INVESTMENTS, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC S TESLER
Represented By: Leslie Ann Weygandt Barnes
Represented By: Michael A. Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?