INDYCAR LLC v. BOSTON GRAND PRIX, et al.
INDYCAR LLC |
BOSTON GRAND PRIX, LLC, JOHN CASEY and MARK PERRONE |
1:2016cv01274 |
May 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. For the reasons detailed in the Court's Entry on Damages, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action in favor of Plaintiff IndyCar LLC, and against pro se Defendant John Casey, for a total amount of $3,926,795.48. (See Judgment.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/22/2018.(NAD) |
Filing 128 ENTRY - 120 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on its breach of contract and fraud claims. The Court will set this matter for a damages hearing in a separate entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/20/2017. (Copy mailed to Defendant) (MEJ) |
Filing 77 ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and the Defendant's objection is OVERRULED. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/4/2017.(JLS) |
Filing 20 ENTRY OF JURISDICTION - As such, this Court GRANTS the Plaintiff's request for limited discovery to determine the members of the Defendant, Boston Grand Prix, LLC, and to identify their citizenship for purposes of jurisdiction. The Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file a supplemental jurisdictional statement, identifying the members of the Defendant LLC and alleging their citizenship within 30 days after the date of this entry. *See order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/20/2016.(JLS) Modified on 6/21/2016 (JLS). |
Filing 14 ENTRY ON JURISDICTION - On May 23, 2016, Plaintiff, Indy Car, LLC, filed a Complaint. (Filing No. 1.) However, the Complaint fails to allege all of the facts necessary to determine whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case. The Complaint alleges that the Court has jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship. Nevertheless, the Complaint fails to sufficiently allege the citizenship of the parties. Citizenship is the operative consideration for jurisdictional purp oses. See Meyerson v. Harrah's E. Chi. Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002). In particular, the Complaint does not sufficiently identify the members of Indy Car, LLC or Boston Grand Prix, LLC; and the Complaint does not adequately allege their citizenship. To remedy this error, this Court ORDERS the Plaintiff to file a supplemental jurisdictional statement to sufficiently establish this Court's jurisdiction over this case. The Plaintiff's statement must accurately identi fy the members of Indy Car, LLC and Boston Grand Prix, LLC and articulate their citizenship. The Plaintiff's supplemental jurisdictional statement is due 14 days after the date of this entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/1/2016.(JLS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.