PETERSON v. BUTTS et al
| ALLENN PETERSON |
| KEITH BUTTS, MISTY CECIL, JENNIFER FRENCH, FARRAH OWENS, A PETTY, MICHAEL THOMBLESON and JUSTIN UPCHURCH |
| 1:2016cv01280 |
| May 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
Entry Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment And Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Defendants Jennifer French and Michael Thombleson's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 29 , is granted. Because this resolves all claims against all defendants, Final Judgment shall now enter. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/19/2018. (BRR)
|
|
Filing
18
ENTRY Directing Development of Exhaustion Defense and Issuing Partial Stay - Accordingly, the defendants shall have through December 2, 2016, in which to either 1) file a dispositive motion in support of the affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit, 2) notify the Court that this affirmative defense is not amenable to resolution through a dispositive motion, or 3) notify the Court that the defendants will not pursue the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust. If a dispositive motion is filed, the plaintiff shall have twenty-eight (28) days in which to respond. The defendants shall then have fourteen (14) days in which to reply. Except for activities associate d with the development and resolution of the defendants' affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this action, or any other matter directed by the Court, any other activities or deadlines in the action are stayed. **SEE ORDER** Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/13/2016.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
11
Entry Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The claim that defendants Thombleson and French have retaliated against Peterson for Peterson's filing of lawsuits shall proceed. Any claim against defendant Upchurch for retaliat ion is dismissed because Peterson does not adequately allege a chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred.The clerk shall terminate all defendants except Thombleson and French from the docket. The clerk is designated pur suant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Thombleson and French in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. **SEE ORDER** Copy sent to Plaintiff and Defendants via U.S. Mail (per distribution list). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/11/2016.(JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
