ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
||ACRUX DDS PTY LTD., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY EXPORT S.A.
||APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
||June 20, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||William T. Lawrence
||Debra McVicker Lynch
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 3, 2017
ORDER denying Defendants' 83 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Motion to Stay. The Court's previous order that the parties shall submit a joint case management plan within fourteen days of the date of the Federal Circuit 039;s ruling in Perrigo remains in force. If the parties are unable to agree on a case management schedule, they shall file a motion for an expedited status conference to resolve their differences. It remains the Court's intention to resolve this matter as efficiently as possible once the stay is lifted. (S.O.). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/3/2017. (MAC)
|February 8, 2017
ENTRY ON MOTION TO STAY - This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay or Administratively Close Case Pending Resolution of Related Case on Appeal (Dkt. No. 37 ). The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advi sed, GRANTS the motion to the extent and for the reasons set forth below. The Court also GRANTS the Defendants' related motion for leave to file a surreply (Dkt. No. 66 ), and the Clerk is directed to docket the surreply, which is found at D kt. No. 66-1. The Court has considered the surreply in making this ruling. The Plaintiffs' motion to stay is GRANTED and this case is STAYED pending resolution of the Federal Circuit's ruling in Perrigo. The parties shall submit a joint case management plan within fourteen days of the date of the Federal Circuit's ruling in Perrigo. If the parties are unable to agree on a case management schedule, they shall file a motion for an expedited status conference to resolve their differences. It is the Court's intention to resolve this matter as efficiently as possible once the stay is lifted. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/8/2017. (BRR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?