BOYD v. JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
NORETTA F. BOYD |
HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPANY |
1:2016cv02028 |
July 18, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 ORDER - Boyd's motion to alter the judgment, Dkt. 119 , is DENIED. Boyd's motion for costs, Dkt. 122 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/19/2017. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 115 ORDER - The Defendants' motions to dismiss 34 and 52 are therefore GRANTED in full and Boyd's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Final judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/29/2017. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 103 ORDER - HHC's 96 motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted in that Boyd must respond to discovery requests within 14 days of this order and be deposed within 28 days of this order. The motion is denied in that Boyd is not ordered to pay attorney fees incurred in failing to attend her deposition and for HHC bringing the present motion. However, if HHC prevails in this litigation, it may seek an award of costs. Moreover, Boyd's continued failure to comply could result in dismissal of this action. Copy Mailed. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/18/2017. (MGG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.