WILLIS v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
||COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and SUPERINTENDENT OF THE PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
||August 1, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Denise K. LaRue
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 28, 2017
ENTRY denying Plaintiff's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Entry. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/28/2017. (SWM)
|September 6, 2016
ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters - The parties shall have through September 20, 2016 in which to consent to, in which to object to, or in which to propose special procedures pertaining to, consolidating the hearing on the motion for preliminary i njunction with trial on the merits. The plaintiff shall have through September 20, 2016 in which to either voluntarily dismiss one of the designated defendants or show cause why the Court should not strike the claims against one of the defendants as redundant. Although it is evident from the proceedings that the defendants intend to resist the injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff, they have not yet filed an answer to the complaint. It is appropriate that they do so without delay. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/6/2016.(JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?