KINSELLA v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District KINSELLA v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.

KINSELLA v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.

Plaintiff:	SANDRA KINSELLA
Defendant:	INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.
Case Number:	1:2016cv02252
Filed:	August 24, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Matthew P. Brookman
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2020	Filing 126 ENTRY - Dr. Kinsella clearly disagrees with the Magistrate Judges evaluation of the proceedings, conclusion that she should not be granted leave to amend her Complaint to add a new claim against new defendants, and decision regarding case management deadlines in this years-old case. But Dr. Kinsellas disagreement does not equate to clear or legal error, and the Magistrate Judge amply justified his decisions with discussions of relevant law and observations from the previous proceedings in this m atter. Therefore, the Court: OVERRULES Dr. Kinsellas Objections to United States Magistrate Judge Brookmans Order Denying Her Motion for Leave to File Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint, 107 ; and OVERRULES Dr. Kinsellas Objections to United States Magistrate Judge Brookmans Order on Second Amended Case Management Plan, 114 . (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/7/2020. (JDH)
July 19, 2019	Filing 97 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Second Motion to Reopen Case. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to fi le objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 96 . It is now ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff's Second Motion to Reopen Case (Docket No. 87)is GRANTED and the case is Reopened. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/19/2019.(JDH)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2020

Filing 126 ENTRY - Dr. Kinsella clearly disagrees with the Magistrate Judges evaluation of the proceedings, conclusion that she should not be granted leave to amend her Complaint to add a new claim against new defendants, and decision regarding case management deadlines in this years-old case. But Dr. Kinsellas disagreement does not equate to clear or legal error, and the Magistrate Judge amply justified his decisions with discussions of relevant law and observations from the previous proceedings in this m atter. Therefore, the Court: OVERRULES Dr. Kinsellas Objections to United States Magistrate Judge Brookmans Order Denying Her Motion for Leave to File Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint, 107 ; and OVERRULES Dr. Kinsellas Objections to United States Magistrate Judge Brookmans Order on Second Amended Case Management Plan, 114 . (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/7/2020. (JDH)

July 19, 2019

Filing 97 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Second Motion to Reopen Case. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to fi le objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 96 . It is now ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff's Second Motion to Reopen Case (Docket No. 87)is GRANTED and the case is Reopened. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/19/2019.(JDH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KINSELLA v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.
Represented By:	Stephanie Lynn Cassman
Represented By:	Laura Marie Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SANDRA KINSELLA
Represented By:	Brittany Lyn Shaw
Represented By:	Mark R. Waterfill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?