WADE v. IUSM et al
| PATRICIA ANN WADE |
| SHERYL ALLEN, IUSM and ABBY KLEMSZ |
| 1:2016cv02256 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ENTRY - DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 108 POST JUDGMENT MOTION. For the reasons stated above, the Court determines that it did not commit a manifest error of law or fact in its previous Entry granting the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and there is no newly submitted evidence that justifies an amendment or alteration to the Court's previous Entry. Therefore, Ms. Wade's Post Judgment Motion for reconsideration of the Court's Entry on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 108 is DENIED. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/17/2019. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons stated above, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 68 ) is GRANTED, and Wade's Rule 37(b) Motion for Judgment (Filing No. 72 ) is DENIED. The trial is vacated and all other pending motions are denied as moot. Final judgment will issue under separate order. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/12/2019. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
105
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' 100 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLAINTIFF'S 104 MOTION FOR PRETRIAL PURGING OF HER IUSM EMPLOYEE FILE. Having reviewed the Defendants' ; proposed sur-reply, the Court finds it is appropriate and grants Defendants request for leave. (Filing No. 100 .) The Sur-reply at Filing No. 100-1 will be considered by the Court when ruling on the pending cross motions for summary judgment. I n her Motion, Ms. Wade asks the Court to order the Defendants to remove certain documents from her Indiana University School of Medicine employee file and modify the reason for her termination in her employee file. This request is one component of the relief that Ms. Wade has made in her Complaint, and entitlement to this relief is the subject of the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment. Therefore, the Court denies the Plaintiff's Motion for Pretrial Purging of Her IUSM Employee File ( Filing No. 104 ). This request will be resolved in the Court's forthcoming order on the cross-motions for summary judgment. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2019. (NAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
