BAILEY v. BUTTS
||October 3, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Mark J. Dinsmore
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 9, 2017
ENTRY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS - For the reasons explained above, Mr. Bailey's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is GRANTED. The disciplinary sanctions imposed as a result of prison disciplinary proceeding NCF 16-04-0263 are VACATED, meaning his lost good-time credits and demotion of credit class must be immediately restored, and his new release date must be calculated accordingly. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/09/2017.(JLS)
|February 9, 2017
ENTRY Regarding the Due Process Right to Call Witnesses at Prison Disciplinary Proceedings and Directing Further Proceedings in this Action - The respondent shall have through February 15, 2017, in which to provide the required justification for d enying Mr. Bailey the ability to call live witnesses during the challenged disciplinary proceeding. Given Mr. Bailey's current projected release date, the Court does not anticipate granting any extensions of time. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/9/2017.(JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?